The purpose of the Call for Expression of Interest is to solicit interest from existing or prospective Implementing Partners that wish to participate in UN-Habitat operation and contribute complementary resources (human resources, knowledge, funds, in-kind contributions, supplies and/or equipment) to achieving common objectives as outlined below and subsequently agreed in an Agreement of Cooperation |
Size of grant: USD 30,000
Purpose of CFP: This Call for Proposal aims at identifying one Implementing Partner (IP), in the form of a Non-Government Organization (NGO) or Civil Society Organization (CSO), to contribute for the implementation of the project “COVID-19 Response in Informal Settlements in Guinea-Bissau”. The entity will be responsible for applying surveys in five cities of Guinea-Bissau (Bissau, Bafata, Gabu, Manosa and Bubaque) focused on identifying the main socioeconomic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and other diseases in informal settlements.
Project Key Information
- UN-Habitat Project title: COVID-19 Response in Informal Settlements in Guinea-Bissau
- Locations
- Town/City: Bissau, Bafata, Gabu, Manosa and Bubaque
- Country: Guinea-Bissau
- Anticipated start date: August 2022
- Estimated duration of project in calendar months: 17 months (August 2022 to December 2023)
- Maximum proposed value in US$: 30,000
- Lead Organization Unit: UN-Habitat Guinea-Bissau Country Office
Brief Background of the Project
The incidence of COVID-19 and other diseases has a catastrophic impact on the entire population, particularly on vulnerable individuals living in informal settlements. This is the case not only in Bissau but in several urban areas of the country, who already suffer from a variety of issues, ranging from lack of access to basic infrastructure to limited job opportunities. Nevertheless, there is a lack of a better understanding of the socio-economic impact of such diseases on informal settlements, and how they can exacerbate existing challenges. In addition, there is limited acknowledgement of the level of information that communities receive about the pandemic, its impacts, and potential long-term effects. Therefore, actions taken by the Government of Guinea-Bissau, development partners and other entities in combating the crisis of COVID-19, as well as other issues faced by these communities, have limited effectiveness.
The overall objective of the project is to support national and international institutions with an evidence-based strategy for action in the most vulnerable communities Guinea-Bissau to minimize the socio-economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as underlying issues, such as poor sanitation, with impacts in malaria and tuberculosis levels.
Evidence will be provided by a community-based collaborative approach to data collection and analysis of the situation in COVID-19 hot-spots, spatializing the impacts in most vulnerable areas at the local level.
The project will also include quick win small-scale actions in selected communities in areas such as environmental sanitation (reducing malaria burden by reducing mosquito breeding grounds), improved access to water and sanitation (focused on reducing under 5 mortality), and housing adaptation (e.g. aeration, ventilation) to minimize risk of COVID and TB transmission. Interventions will be community-driven and will also serve to inform the response strategy based on the evaluation of their impact in the ground.
Main activities and outputs
The Implementing Partner (IP) will be undertaking the following main activities:
- Activity 1 - Training with UN-Habitat methodology for socio-economic impact analysis
The project includes a significant capacity-building component, so the partner will be involved and trained since project inception. Up to 10 technicians should be made available for the training sessions, including at least five supervisors of the survey application from the different capital cities of the country's regions. The supervisors will oversee training the other team members.
The partner should have a team responsible for applying the survey, per municipality, consisting of five (5) members: one (1) supervisor and four (4) surveyors, for each of the five (5) cities covered by the study, having as a total twenty (20) members, focusing on one (1) neighborhood/informal settlement per city. The surveyors will contact the different community leaders and relevant actors for understanding the realities and dynamics of the city will initially be carried out by the inquirers.
- Activity 2 - Elaboration of the detailed work plan, including methodology
The application of the study will use as methodology a call center for remote data collection via the IP’s network of technicians and members spread throughout all the areas covered by the study.
The IP will organize one (1) public presentation session per city for a maximum of 20 people (or the number stated by government COVID-19 restrictions) in each of the cities foreseen in the study. The sessions will be coordinated by the supervisors. For each session, the IP will invite community, traditional and social leaders, different actors and organizations with influence and community mobilization capacity, as well as representatives of local administrative authorities, to facilitate the implementation of the study.
After the presentation sessions, the IP will create a final contact list of the survey, to further allow the application of the survey in the different cities.
The IP will provide a list of contacts with more than 200 contacts per city.
- Activity 3 - Public Presentation of the Survey
The IP team of supervisors, responsible for following up the application of the surveys will make a single trip to each city in the initial phase of the application of the study, with the objective of holding the first public session for the presentation of the study, as well as for the training/environmental work to the surveyors. Awareness raising will occur with the support of community radio stations that will publicize the ongoing process, as well as the direct involvement of community and traditional leaders of each selected neighborhood, through small meetings at the local level.
- Activity 4 - Implementation of the surveys in the selected informal settlements in the cities of Bissau, Bubaque, Gabu, Mansoa and Bafata
The IP will carry out follow-up contacts and data collection remotely, during the application of the survey. If there is any need to travel, this will have to be studied and duly justified with the coordination of the study.
It is anticipated that the IP will apply at least 200 surveys per city (100 for each informal settlement).
- Activity 5 - Data consolidation and analysis
The IP will perform the data consolidation and analysis remotely, led by each of the supervisors, working directly with their surveyors. The supervisors will identify any issues related to the data entered by the inquirers, to clarify and consolidate them. The IP will set up a team responsible to carry out a final data analysis and consolidation.
Risk Analysis
Project specific risk |
Risk level |
Mitigation strategy (including Do No Harm considerations) |
Stricter Covid-19 prevention measures (local travel, meetings) could impede the realization of activities as they have been planned and impact the achievement of the project outcomes. |
Probability: Low Impact for the project: Medium |
The experience developed in the last years equipped the different partners with a better understanding of dynamics underlying this multidimensional crisis and how to better address them. Regular communications with the Covid-19 High Commission will help the project team to monitor the situation and prompt develop effective solutions without impacting the achievement of the project. |
Political instability may affect the achievement of the expected outputs and lead to political manipulation affecting the overall impact of the project. |
Probability: Medium Impact for the project: High |
The steering committee will regularly assess the political situation in consultation with relevant actors. The reputation and recognized neutrality of the project implementing partners in the country will be fundamental to avoid political manipulation. |
Males and elders' “dominance” in speeches and decision making versus women and youth could create a gender bias at the implementation level affecting women and young women's real participation within the project |
Probability: Medium Impact for the project: High
|
The project will put in place specific mechanisms to allow women and young women to freely express themselves in the framework of the project activities. The understanding of social dynamics and roles within targeted communities and the support of local implementing partners will be fundamental. |
Climatic conditions (heavy rains) may affect implementing partners' mobility during field activities during rainy season (July to October) and delay the implementation of the project |
Probability: High Impact for the project: Low |
The planning of activities will take into account the rainy season to ensure feasibility of all activities without delays. |
Limited engagement and/or dissatisfaction with collaborative processes |
Probability: Medium Impact for the project: High |
Collaborative processes on survey and analysis of socio-economic impacts are a well-established process globally. Dissemination and awareness activities were embedded into the project to ensure communities understand the purpose of the project before any activities take place. |
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria |
Submission Details/ Documents Required |
Legal Status |
|
Organization profile and details |
|
Financial Capacity |
|
Exclusive bank account |
|
Integrity and Governance |
|
Selection Criteria
Criteria |
Submission Details/ Documents Required |
Weighting |
1. Technical capacity |
|
25% |
1.1 Does the organization have the relevant experience and proven track record in implementing activities in the areas of the project? Has it managed in the past projects of similar technical complexities and financial size? Is the project linked with the core business of the IP? |
|
|
1.2 Does the organization have qualified technical staff with the experience and the technical skills required by the project? What is the staff size, type, qualification and education background? |
|
|
1.3 Does the organization have a clear and strong link with an identifiable constituency relevant to the targeted population of the project? Does it have the ability to impact on the targeted population and on the issues? Does it have strong presence in the field and for how long? Does it have adequate capacity to work in key areas/regions where the proposed field activities will be implemented? |
|
|
1.4 Does the organization possess adequate physical facilities, office equipment, transport, etc. to implement the activities? |
|
|
1.5 Does the organization have formal procedures to monitor project execution (e.g. milestones, outputs, expenditures…) |
|
|
2. Financial and administrative capacity |
|
15% |
2.1 Has the organization been in operation over a period of at least 2 years to demonstrate its financial sustainability and relevance? |
|
|
2.2 Does the organization have qualified staff in Finance? Is the current accounting system computerized and does have the capacity to collect and provide separate financial reports on the activities executed under the Agreement of Cooperation? Does it have systems and practices to monitor and report whether the project deliverables and expenditures are within agreed time and budget? Does it have minimum segregation of duties in place (separation between project management, finance/accounting and executive office)
|
|
|
2.3 Does the organization have the capacity to procure goods and services on a transparent and competitive basis? (if applicable) check for procurement unit with experienced staff |
|
|
2.4 Does the organization have formal procedures and controls to mitigate fraud such as multiple signature signatories on bank accounts, reporting and prosecution of incidences of fraud? |
|
|
2.5 Does the organization have capacity to provide in-kind, financial, personnel contribution as UN-Habitat Implementing Partner in this present project? Please give details of contribution nature and size. |
|
|
3. Financial Proposal |
|
30% |
3.1 Is the budget for each component of the activity to be performed by the Implementing Partner (i) cost-effective (i.e. the cost should be economical and prudently estimated to avoid any under/over estimation) (ii) justifiable/well supported and (iii) accurate and complete |
Budget Proposal <provide link>
|
|
4. Technical Proposal |
|
30% |
4.1 The technical proposal is sound and responds adequately to the specifications and requirements? |
Technical Proposal document <provide link>
|
|
Cumulative score for ratios |
|
100% |
Notes:
- Interested Organizations must provide information indicating that they are qualified to perform the services (brochure, description of similar assignments, experience in similar conditions, availability of appropriate skills among staff, etc).
- The CFP and accompanying documents must be received in accordance with instructions provided. CFP submitted to a different email address other than the specified one (Evandro.holz@un.org) will not be considered.
- CFP from applicants failing to provide the complete information to fulfill the basic eligibility criteria will be considered non-responsive.
- CFP received after the above deadline will not be considered
- Organizations will be selected in accordance with the procedure set out in the UN-Habitat IP Management policy and Standard Operating Procedures.
- CFP from applicants failing to provide the requested information will be disregarded.
- This CFP does not entail any commitment on the part of UN-Habitat, either financial or otherwise. UN-Habitat reserves the right to accept or reject any or all Proposals without incurring any obligation to inform the affected applicant(s) of the grounds.
- All prices must be in USD